Developed Model

I have decide to choose the "Rhythm and organic" concept, because the differences among the two spaces are more obvious and I would make bigger contradictions among the two spaces.
Meanwhile, as for learning processes, having curvy and straight elements in my assignment would practice my skills of architectural programming. And having two contrast parts in my model, I would be able to generate two different feelings of the two spaces. I would be able to make use of two sets of materiality for the spaces. The building would be much more inspiring and stunning.
Talking back to the design approach, having clear identification of the upper and lower spaces would define the functions of the spaces better and clarifies the gallery space and studio space clearly. Moreover, two contrasting approaches would be more playful and fun to stay in, giving more inspirations to both artists and visitors.

First attempt of developed model

For the upper part, l I start making inspiring spaces with different scale of trangles and different sizes of rectangles as different stairs.

However, the geometry is not that matching in overall and interiors is not talking in the same language with the exteriors.

The stairs is having similar geometry with the overall shapes, however, because of different orientation (vertical and horizontal), the building seems to have different components but not as a whole.

For the below part, everything seems working well by defining interior subspaces in leave motifs and having the exterior affect the interiors.

AND THE FAILURE AND DISADVANTAGES OF THIS MODEL HAS LEADED TO THE SECOND ATTEMPT OF DEVELOPED MODEL.

Second attempt of developed model

After changing the interiors following the exterior geometry and having horizontal elements all along the above part while curvy and floral division elements in the below one; the model is able to communicate the concept rhythm and organic sharply.